Allahabad High Court
UPENDRA NATH RAIversusDISTRICT INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS AND 2 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
The appellant, Upendra Nath Rai, filed a special appeal against the District Inspector of Schools and two others. No party appeared to press the appeal, and only the State's standing counsel was present. The High Court held that the appeal could not proceed without prosecution and dismissed it. Consequently, any interim order that had been passed was vacated. The judgment was delivered on May 5, 2026.
Subjects
- appeal
- procedural
- want of prosecution
- interim order vacated
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
SPECIAL APPEAL No. - 1128 of 2013
Upendra Nath Rai
.....Appellant(s)
Versus
District Inspector Of Schools And 2 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Appellant(s) : Ashwani Kumar Rai, Hritudhwaj
Pratap Sahi, Irshad Ali, K.N. Tripathi,
Vijay Kumar Singh
Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C.
Court No. - 3
HON'BLE SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH, J.
HON'BLE SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI, J.
1. List revised.
2. None appears to press this appeal. However, Sri Ankit Gaur, learned
Standing Counsel for the State-respondents is present.
3. Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
4. Interim order, if any, is vacated.
(Swarupama Chaturvedi,J.) (Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.)
May 5, 2026
Anurag/-
Digitally signed by :-
ANURAG JAISWAL
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…