Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

KRISHNA KESHAV SONIversusUNION OF INDIA THRU SECRY. HOME AND 2 ORS.

Decided

Holding

The appeal is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

Krishna Keshav Soni filed Special Appeal No. 305 of 2014 against the Union of India. The appeal was listed for priority hearing but was barred by a delay of 139 days. No counsel appeared on behalf of the appellant. The Court observed that the appellant had lost interest in the petition due to the passage of time. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Issues considered

  • Whether a special appeal barred by a delay of 139 days can be entertained in the absence of the appellant.

Subjects

  • special appeal
  • delay
  • non-prosecution
  • procedural law

Judgment

                                                     HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                       SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 305 of 2014

                                    Krishna Keshav Soni
                                                                                                 .....Appellant(s)
                                                                         Versus

                                    Union of India through Secretary Home and 2 ors.
                                                                                               .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Appellant(s)          : Surendra Yadav
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)         : A.S.G.I., Rachana      Dubey,    Rachna
                                                                        Dube

                                    Chief Justice's Court
                                                      HON'BLE ARUN BHANSALI, CHIEF JUSTICE
                                                      HON'BLE KSHITIJ SHAILENDRA, J.

                                    1. Though the Special Appeal is listed in the category of 'Oldest pending
                                    cases in this High Court, for priority hearing' and the same is barred by
                                    139 days, none is present for the appellant.

                                    2. Looking to the subject matter of the appeal, it is apparent that due to
                                    passage of time, the appellant has lost interest in the petition, the same is,
                                    therefore, dismissed for non-prosecution.



                                                                    (Kshitij Shailendra,J.) (Arun Bhansali,CJ.)
                                    September 15, 2026
                                    M.Pal/Jyotsana




Digitally signed by :-
MUKESH PAL
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.