Allahabad High Court
RUBI KUMARIversusPUSHPENDRA
- Decided
- Bench
- Y K SRIVASTAVA
Holding
The transfer application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
Rubi Kumari filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 218 of 2024 against Pushpendra in the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to pursue the application, while counsel for the opposite party was present. The court noted the lack of prosecution of the transfer application. Consequently, the judge dismissed the transfer application for want of prosecution. The interim order, if any, that had been granted earlier was vacated.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate procedural consequence when a transfer application is not prosecuted by the applicant?
Subjects
- transfer of suit
- want of prosecution
- civil procedure
- dismissal
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
TRANSFER APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 218 of 2024
Rubi Kumari
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
Pushpendra
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Prem Chandra Dwivedi
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Rishika Raj Singhal, Shivendra Raj
Singhal
Court No. - 35
HON'BLE DR. YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.
Case called out in the revised list.
No one appeared on behalf of the applicant to press this transfer
application.
Sri Manish Kumar, learned Advocate holding brief of Sri Shvendra Raj
Singhal, learned counsel for the opposite party is present.
The transfer application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, granted earlier, stands vacated.
(Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.)
May 5, 2026
Arun K. Singh
Digitally signed by :-
ARUN KUMAR SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…