Allahabad High Court
RICHA SAHAIversusHIMANSHU SHRIVASTAVA
- Decided
- Bench
- Y K SRIVASTAVA
Holding
The transfer application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
The applicant, Richa Sahai, filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 243 of 2025 seeking to move the proceedings to another court. The respondent, Himanshu Shrivastava, was served with the application. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to argue or prosecute the transfer request. The High Court observed that the application was not pursued and therefore dismissed it for want of prosecution. Consequently, any interim order that had been granted earlier was vacated.
Issues considered
- What is the procedural consequence of a transfer application that is not prosecuted before the court?
Subjects
- transfer of suit
- civil procedure
- want of prosecution
- dismissal
- interim order vacated
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
TRANSFER APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 243 of 2025
Richa Sahai
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
Himanshu Shrivastava
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Nilam Shukla, Surnedra Prasad Shukla
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Dr. Aditya Kumar Trivedi
Court No. - 35
HON'BLE DR. YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.
Case called out in the revised list.
No one appeared on behalf of the applicant to press this transfer
application.
The transfer application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, granted earlier, stands vacated.
(Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.)
May 5, 2026
Arun K. Singh
Digitally signed by :-
ARUN KUMAR SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…