Allahabad High Court
PragyaversusGaurav Prakash
- Decided
- Bench
- Y K SRIVASTAVA
Holding
The transfer application is dismissed for want of prosecution, and the earlier interim order is vacated.
Summary
Pragya filed a transfer application (Civil No. 31 of 2024) seeking to move the pending suit to another court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application. The High Court observed that the application was not prosecuted and dismissed it for want of prosecution. As a result, any interim order that had been granted earlier was vacated. The dismissal leaves the original suit proceeding in the present court unchanged.
Issues considered
- Whether a transfer application can proceed in the absence of any party appearing to prosecute it
- Whether an interim order granted earlier should stand when the transfer application is dismissed
Subjects
- transfer of suit
- want of prosecution
- interim order vacated
- civil procedure
- high court
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
TRANSFER APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 31 of 2024
Pragya
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
Gaurav Prakash
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anil Kumar Singh, Anil Kumar Singh
Bishen
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : A.K.Umrao
Court No. - 35
HON'BLE DR. YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.
Case called out in the revised list.
No one appeared on behalf of the applicant to press this transfer
application.
The transfer application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, granted earlier, stands vacated.
(Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.)
May 6, 2026
Arun K. Singh
Digitally signed by :-
ARUN KUMAR SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…