Allahabad High Court
KRITIKA AGARWALversusARPIT AGARWAL
- Decided
- Bench
- Y K SRIVASTAVA
Holding
The transfer application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
In a civil transfer application (No. 38 of 2025) filed by Kritika Agarwal against Arpit Agarwal, the applicant failed to appear or present counsel before the court. The High Court noted that no one had appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the transfer request. Consequently, the court dismissed the transfer application on the ground of want of prosecution. The court also vacated any interim order that might have been granted earlier in the proceedings. No substantive merits of the transfer were considered due to the procedural lapse.
Issues considered
- Whether a transfer application can proceed in the absence of the applicant’s representation.
Subjects
- transfer of suit
- civil procedure
- want of prosecution
- dismissal
- interim order vacated
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
TRANSFER APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 38 of 2025
Kritika Agarwal
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
Arpit Agarwal
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ramesh Chandra Agrahari
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Ramajan Ahmad
Court No. - 35
HON'BLE DR. YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.
Case called out in the revised list.
No one appeared on behalf of the applicant to press this transfer
application.
The transfer application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, granted earlier, stands vacated.
(Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.)
May 5, 2026
Arun K. Singh
Digitally signed by :-
ARUN KUMAR SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…