Allahabad High Court
SMT. SEEMAversusRAJU SHARMA
- Decided
- Bench
- Y K SRIVASTAVA
Holding
The transfer application was dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
Smt. Seema filed a civil transfer application (No. 479 of 2023) against Raju Sharma. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to pursue the application. The High Court noted the lack of prosecution and dismissed the transfer application. Consequently, any interim order previously granted was vacated. The decision underscores the necessity of active representation for procedural filings.
Issues considered
- Whether a transfer application can proceed in the absence of representation by the applicant's counsel
Subjects
- transfer application
- want of prosecution
- civil procedure
- vacated interim order
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
TRANSFER APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 479 of 2023
Smt. Seema
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
Raju Sharma
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Deisy Pundir, Rahul Singh Tomar
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Ramesh Chandra Srivastava, Satendra
Kumar
Court No. - 35
HON'BLE DR. YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.
Case called out in the revised list.
No one appeared on behalf of the applicant to press this transfer
application.
The transfer application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, granted earlier, stands vacated.
(Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.)
May 6, 2026
Arun K. Singh
Digitally signed by :-
ARUN KUMAR SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…