Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SMT POONAM AND 3 OTHERSversusARVIND KUMAR

Decided

Holding

The Court dismissed the transfer application for want of prosecution as no counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant.

Summary

The petitioners, Smt Poonam and three others, filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 550 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press the application. The respondent, Arvind Kumar, was represented by counsel. The Court observed that the application was not prosecuted and therefore could not be entertained. Consequently, the transfer application was dismissed for want of prosecution.

Issues considered

  • Whether the transfer application should be dismissed for want of prosecution

Subjects

  • Civil Procedure Code
  • Transfer of suit
  • Dismissal for want of prosecution

Judgment

                                              HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                 TRANSFER APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 550 of 2025

                                    Smt Poonam And 3 Others
                                                                                                 .....Applicant(s)
                                                                          Versus

                                    Arvind Kumar
                                                                                                     .....Opposite
                                                                                                           Party(s)

                                    Counsel for Applicant(s)      : Nand Kishor Mishra
                                    Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Sachin Kumar Ojha, Chandra Mani
                                                                    Pandey

                                    Court No. - 35
                                             HON'BLE DR. YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.

                                    1. Case called out in the revised list.

                                    2. No one appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application.

                                    3. The application stands dismissed for want of prosecution.

                                    4. Sri Chandra Mani Pandey, learned counsel for the respondent is
                                    present.



                                                                              (Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.)
                                    September 30, 2026
                                    Sushma




Digitally signed by :-
SUSHAMA YADAV
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.