Allahabad High Court
SMT ANAMIKA SINGHversusSH. ANURAG VYAS
- Decided
- Bench
- Y K SRIVASTAVA
Holding
The transfer application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
In a civil transfer application (No. 59 of 2024) filed by Smt. Anamika Singh against Sh. Anurag Vyas, the applicant's counsel, Shailesh Kumar Mishra, failed to appear before the court to pursue the application. The High Court noted the absence of any representation on behalf of the applicant and consequently dismissed the transfer application for want of prosecution. The court also vacated any interim order that might have been granted earlier in the proceedings. No substantive merits of the transfer request were examined due to the procedural lapse. The dismissal reflects the court's adherence to procedural rules requiring active prosecution of applications.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate procedural consequence when a transfer application is not prosecuted by the applicant?
Subjects
- transfer application
- civil procedure
- want of prosecution
- interim order vacated
- procedural default
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
TRANSFER APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 59 of 2024
Smt Anamika Singh
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
Sh. Anurag Vyas
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shailesh Kumar Mishra
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Krishna Gopal
Court No. - 35
HON'BLE DR. YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.
Case called out in the revised list.
No one appeared on behalf of the applicant to press this transfer
application.
The transfer application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, granted earlier, stands vacated.
(Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.)
May 5, 2026
Arun K. Singh
Digitally signed by :-
ARUN KUMAR SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…