Allahabad High Court
AASTHA SHUKLAversusAKSHAY BHARADWAJ
- Decided
- Bench
- Y K SRIVASTAVA
Holding
The transfer application was dismissed for want of prosecution, and the earlier interim order was vacated.
Summary
Aastha Shukla filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 831 of 2024 against Akshay Bharadwaj. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to pursue the application, while the opposite party's counsel was present. The Court observed that the application was not prosecuted and therefore dismissed it for want of prosecution. Consequently, any interim order that had been granted earlier was vacated. The dismissal leaves the original suit to continue in the court where it was originally filed.
Issues considered
- Whether a transfer application can be entertained when the applicant fails to prosecute it?
Subjects
- transfer of suit
- want of prosecution
- interim order vacated
- civil procedure
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
TRANSFER APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 831 of 2024
Aastha Shukla
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
Akshay Bharadwaj
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Manisha Chaturvedi, Vivek Chaturvedi
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Rajesh Kumar Chitragupt
Court No. - 35
HON'BLE DR. YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.
Case called out in the revised list.
No one appeared on behalf of the applicant to press this transfer
application.
Sri Rajesh Kumar Chitragupt, counsel appearing for the opposite party is
present.
The transfer application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, granted earlier, stands vacated.
(Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.)
May 5, 2026
Arun K. Singh
Digitally signed by :-
ARUN KUMAR SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…