Allahabad High Court
VINEETA SRIVASTAVAversusASHUTOSH SRIVASTAVA
- Decided
- Bench
- Y K SRIVASTAVA
Holding
The transfer application was dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
Vineeta Srivastava filed a transfer application in the Allahabad High Court against Ashutosh Srivastava. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to pursue the application. The court noted the lack of prosecution and dismissed the transfer application. Consequently, any interim order previously granted was vacated. The decision reflects the procedural requirement that a party must actively prosecute a transfer application for it to be considered.
Issues considered
- Whether a transfer application can proceed in the absence of any party appearing to prosecute it
Subjects
- transfer of suit
- want of prosecution
- dismissal
- interim order vacated
- procedural law
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
TRANSFER APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 918 of 2023
Vineeta Srivastava
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
Ashutosh Srivastava
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shailja Kant Tripathi, Shashank Singh,
Shrey Singh
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Akshat Sinha, Sanyukta Singh
Court No. - 35
HON'BLE DR. YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.
Case called out in the revised list.
No one appeared on behalf of the applicant to press this transfer
application.
The transfer application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, granted earlier, stands vacated.
(Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.)
May 6, 2026
Arun K. Singh
Digitally signed by :-
ARUN KUMAR SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…