Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

AEYSHA BEGAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Decided

Holding

The transfer application is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The applicant, Aeysha Begam, filed a criminal transfer application (No. 634 of 2023) before the Allahabad High Court seeking transfer of the trial. Counsel for the applicant, Om Prakash and Shrikrishna, appeared along with counsel for the State and another respondent. During the hearing, the applicant’s counsel informed the court that the application was to be withdrawn. The court considered the request and, finding no objection, allowed the prayer to withdraw. Consequently, the transfer application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether the criminal transfer application should be entertained or dismissed as withdrawn

Subjects

  • criminal transfer
  • withdrawal of application
  • high court procedure

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                             TRANSFER APPLICATION (CRIMINAL) No. - 634 of 2023

                                    Aeysha Begam
                                                                                              .....Applicant(s)
                                                                      Versus

                                    State of U.P. and Another
                                                                                                     .....Opposite
                                                                                                           Party(s)

                                    Counsel for Applicant(s)      : Om Prakash, Shrikrishna
                                    Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Deeksha Gupta, G.A.,               Siddharth
                                                                    Srivastava

                                    Court No. - 53
                                                         HON'BLE SAMIT GOPAL, J.

                                    1. Heard Sri Om Prakash, learned counsel for the applicant, Ms. Saumya
                                    Shukla, holding brief of Sri Siddharth Srivastava, learned counsel for the
                                    opposite party no. 2, Sri Shashikant Pandey, learned AGA for the
                                    State/opposite party no. 1 and perused the records.

                                    2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicant submits that
                                    the present application for transfer be dismissed as withdrawn.

                                    3. The prayer is allowed.

                                    4. The present transfer application is dismissed as withdrawn.



                                                                                             (Samit Gopal,J.)
                                    March 18, 2026
                                    Nisha




Digitally signed by :-
nisha kumari
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.