Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

UMESH CHAND MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

In Public Interest Litigation No. 207 of 2026, the petitioner, Umesh Chand Mishra, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, the petitioner's counsel, Gaurav Sharan Srivastava, requested that the petition be dismissed as withdrawn. The standing counsel for the State respondents, Sri Fuzail Ahmad Ansari, raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court considered the request and found no impediment to dismissing the petition. Consequently, the Court ordered that the writ petition be dismissed as withdrawn, and the order was signed by both judges on March 19, 2026.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition may be dismissed as withdrawn upon the petitioner's request

Subjects

  • public interest litigation
  • withdrawal
  • writ petition
  • procedural dismissal
  • Allahabad High Court

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                              PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 207 of 2026

                                    Umesh Chand Mishra
                                                                                               .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                      Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 4 Others
                                                                                             .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)             :    Gaurav Sharan Srivastava
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)             :    C.S.C.

                                    Court No. - 21
                                                HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J.
                                                HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J.

                                    1. After substantial argument, learned counsel for the petitioner submits
                                    that the instant writ petition may be dismissed as withdrawn.

                                    2. Sri Fuzail Ahmad Ansari, learned Standing Counsel for the State-
                                    respondents has no objection to the same.

                                    3. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.


                                                      (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.)
                                    March 19, 2026
                                    Priya




Digitally signed by :-
PRIYA KUSHWAHA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.