Allahabad High Court
RAKESH SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS
- Decided
- Bench
- ARUN KUMAR
Holding
A PIL is not maintainable where a remedy under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 is available.
Summary
The petitioner sought a writ directing the removal of illegal encroachments by respondents 6 and 7 on a 0.607‑hectare pond (Gata No.217) in Barahi Sahora village, Budaun. The Court noted earlier orders granting time to the standing counsel, which were not utilized. It relied on a Division Bench decision in Amaruddin Ansari v. State of U.P. (PIL No.655 of 2026) that a public‑interest litigation is not maintainable where the villagers have a specific remedy under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. Consequently, the Court disposed of the petition, allowing the petitioner to approach the appropriate authority under the said statutory provision. Any application filed under Section 67 concerning Gata No.217 will be decided according to law.
Issues considered
- Is a public‑interest litigation maintainable when a specific statutory remedy under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 is available to the aggrieved villagers?
- Can the High Court issue a writ directing removal of encroachment on a pond when the remedy lies under the revenue code?
Legislation cited
- Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 — s. 67
Subjects
- public interest litigation
- illegal encroachment
- revenue code
- Section 67
- pond
- jurisdiction
- disposal
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 3586 of 2025
Rakesh Singh
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 6 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mahendra Singh
Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sher Bahadur Singh
Court No. - 55
HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J.
1. The present petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent
no.4 to remove illegal encroachment made by respondent nos.6 and 7
over Gata No.217 area 0.607 hectare, recorded as Pond in the relevant
revenue records, relating to Village Barahi Sahora, Tehsil Dataganj,
District Budaun.
2. Pursuant to the orders of this Court dated 24.11.2025 and 10.2.2026,
learned Standing Counsel was granted time to obtain instructions but the
same could not be received. However, a Division Bench of this Court in
the case of Amaruddin Ansari Vs. State of U.P. and 5 others, passed in
Public Interest Litigation (PIL) No.655 of 2026, decided on 18.03.2026,
has held that Public Interest Litigation Petitions are not maintainable in
cases where remedy under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 are
available to the villagers.
3. In view of the aforesaid, this writ petition is disposed of with liberty to
the petitioner to approach the appropriate authority by moving an
application under Section 67 of Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. If any
such application is filed in respect of Gata No.217, it is expected that it
will be decided, in accordance with law.
(Arun Kumar,J.)
April 23, 2026
Anil
Digitally signed by :-
ANIL KUMAR PATEL
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…