Allahabad High Court
GOVIND SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
- Decided
- Bench
- ANISH KUMAR GUPTA
Holding
The petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Summary
The petitioner, Govind Singh, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner's counsel, Manish Kumar Pandey, was unable to contact his client and indicated that the grievance might have been resolved. Consequently, the petitioner did not appear before the court and no substantive arguments were presented. The court, noting that the petition was not pressed, dismissed the writ petition. The court advised that the petitioner may file a recall application if the cause of action still exists.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition is pressed and should be entertained by the court
Subjects
- writ petition
- dismissal
- procedural
- not pressed
- High Court
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - A No. - 10087 of 2019
Govind Singh
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manish Kumar Pandey
Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C.
Court No. - 34
(Sl. No. 33.1)
HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J.
1. This matter is listed peremptorily today. On the last occasion also, the
matter was adjourned on the request made on behalf of the learned
counsel for the petitioner. Today also, learned counsel for the petitioner
submits that he is not in a position to contact his client and it appears
that the grievance of the petitioner might have been resolved, therefore,
he has not tried to contact his counsel.
2. In such view of the matter, the instant petition is dismissed as not
pressed.
3. The petitioner may file the recall application if the cause of action
still survives in the matter.
(Anish Kumar Gupta,J.)
September 8, 2026
n.u.
Digitally signed by :-
NASEEM UDDIN
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…