Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SMT. RADHIKA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Summary

Petitioner Smt. Radhika Devi filed Writ Petition No. 11423 of 2021 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and three others. The petition remained unattended as the petitioner’s counsel did not appear for the hearing. The case was listed under writs likely to have become infructuous due to the passage of time. The court issued a notice that old cases up to 2022 would be dismissed if no cause of action survived and counsel failed to mark the same. Since there was no appearance and no indication that the cause of action persisted, the court held the petition to be infructuous. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition filed in 2021 is infructuous due to non-appearance and lapse of time

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • infructuous
  • non-appearance
  • procedural dismissal
  • Allahabad High Court

Judgment

                                              HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                              WRIT - A No. - 11423 of 2021

                                    Smt. Radhika Devi
                                                                                                    .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                         Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                                 .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)              :   Vinod Kumar Singh
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)              :   Ashok Kumar Yadav, C.S.C.

                                    Court No. - 52
                                                   HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J.

                                    Case is called out. None appears for the petitioner to press this petition.

                                    It is listed in the category of "writs likely to have become infructuous (Efflux
                                    of time)".

                                    A notice is also placed in the cause list mentioning that "old cases up to the
                                    year 2022 shall be taken up in the first round itself. In case of non-
                                    appearance, matters shall be dismissed as infructuous or otherwise, and in
                                    the cases, where the cause of action still survives, the concerned advocates
                                    are expected to mark them accordingly in the cause list. Failures to do so,
                                    may result in its dismissal as infructuous" but, neither the counsel for the
                                    petitioner has appeared nor the case has been marked to indicate that the
                                    cause of action still survives.

                                    The matter is pending since the year 2021. It appears that either the
                                    petitioner has lost interest in pursuing the matter or it has become
                                    infructuous.

                                    Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous



                                                                                  (Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.)
                                    September 9, 2026
                                    Junaid




Digitally signed by :-
JUNAID AHMAD
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.