Allahabad High Court
SMT.USHA GUPTAversusSMT.URMILA SHUKLA AND ORS.
- Decided
- Bench
- Y K SRIVASTAVA
Holding
The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
Smt. Usha Gupta filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 12464 of 2013) against Smt. Urmila Shukla and others in the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition. The Court observed that the petition was not prosecuted and therefore dismissed it. The earlier interim order, if any, was vacated. The dismissal was pronounced by Justice Yogendra Kumar Srivastava on 16 September 2026.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate course of action when a petition is not prosecuted and no counsel appears for the petitioner?
Subjects
- writ petition
- dismissal for want of prosecution
- interim order vacated
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - A No. - 12464 of 2013
Smt.Usha Gupta
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
Smt.Urmila Shukla And Ors.
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Atul Dayal, Ayush Khanna
Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.K.Shukla
Court No. - 35
HON'BLE DR. YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.
Case called out in the revised list.
No one appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition.
The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, granted earlier, stands vacated.
(Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.)
September 16, 2026
Arun K. Singh
Digitally signed by :-
ARUN KUMAR SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…