Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

GOPAL PRASAD SHARMAversusBHARAT KUMAR VERMA AND OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

The petitioners, Gopal Prasad Sharma, filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 13199 of 2013) before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the respondents, Bharat Kumar Verma and others. The petition was listed and counsel for the petitioners, Ajay Kumar Pathak and Kripa Shanker Singh, were recorded. However, no representative appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press the petition. Consequently, the Court noted a lack of prosecution of the petition. The Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and vacated any interim order that had earlier been granted.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate course of action when a petition is filed but no party appears to prosecute it?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • dismissal
  • want of prosecution
  • procedural default

Judgment

                                                    HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                             WRIT - A No. - 13199 of 2013

                                    Gopal Prasad Sharma
                                                                                                 .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                           Versus

                                    Bharat Kumar Verma And Others
                                                                                               .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)        : Ajay Kumar Pathak, Kripa Shanker
                                                                       Singh
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)        : Kshitij Shailendra, Pankaj Agrawal

                                    Court No. - 35
                                               HON'BLE DR. YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.

                                    Case called out in the revised list.

                                    No one appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition.

                                    The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

                                    Interim order, if any, granted earlier, stands vacated.



                                                                             (Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.)
                                    September 16, 2026
                                    Arun K. Singh




Digitally signed by :-
ARUN KUMAR SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.