Allahabad High Court
ANKIT OBJECTION FILEDversusSTATE OF U.P. THRU SECY. BASIC EDUCATION and 4 ORS.
- Decided
- Disposal
- Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted
- Bench
- IRSHAD ALI
Holding
The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
The petitioner, Ankit, filed a writ petition (WRIT-A No. 140 of 2008) before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, seeking relief against the State of U.P. and others. The petitioner’s counsel, H.G.S. Parihar, was absent on the hearing date, while the respondent’s counsel appeared. The court noted the lack of prosecution of the petition and consequently dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. The court also vacated any interim order that may have been in force. The order was pronounced on 3 August 2022 by Justice Irshad Ali.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate procedural outcome when a petition is not prosecuted?
Subjects
- writ petition
- want of prosecution
- dismissal
- interim order vacated
- procedural law
Judgment
Court No. - 6
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 140 of 2008
Petitioner :- Ankit Objection Filed
Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru Secy. Basic Education And 4
Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- H.G.S. Parihar
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,M.P. Raju,P.R.
Kanaujia,Rajenda Singh Chauhan
Hon'ble Irshad Ali,J.
1. The case is called out in revised list.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner is not present, however,
learned ACSC is present.
3. The case is dismissed for want of prosecution.
4. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 3.8.2022
Adarsh K Singh
Digitally signed by ADARSH KUMAR
SINGH
Date: 2022.08.03 15:10:59 IST
Reason:
Location: High Court of Judicature at
Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Checking your session…