Allahabad High Court
SHRI SHYAM SUNDERversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS
- Decided
- Bench
- MANISH KUMAR NIGAM
Holding
The petition is dismissed as the matter raised therein has already been decided by the respondent authority.
Summary
Shri Shyam Sunder filed Writ‑A No.14481 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that a representation dated 15 September 2025, which formed the basis of the petition, had already been decided by the respondent authority on 30 March 2026. The learned Standing Counsel informed the court of this decision and requested that the petition be disposed. The court noted that since the representation was already adjudicated, there was no substantive question left for adjudication. Consequently, the court ordered the petition to be disposed, while indicating that the petitioner could challenge the earlier decision in accordance with law. The order was pronounced on 11 September 2026.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition should be entertained when the underlying representation has already been decided by the respondent authority.
Subjects
- writ petition
- representation
- procedural disposal
- court jurisdiction
- appeal rights
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - A No. - 14481 of 2026
Shri Shyam Sunder
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of Up And 3 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Jamal Ahmad Khan
Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C.
Court No. - 33
HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
1. Instructions submitted by learned Standing Counsel are taken on
record.
2. On the basis of instructions, it has been submitted by learned Standing
Counsel that representation dated 15.09.2025, which has been prayed to
be decided, has already been decided by the respondent authority on
30.03.2026.
3. Let copy of instructions be given to learned counsel for the petitioner.
4. Since representation has already been decided, no further orders are
required to be passed in this petition.
5. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. However, it is provided that
petitioner, if still aggrieved, he can challenge the order in accordance with
law.
(Manish Kumar Nigam,J.)
September 11, 2026
Nitika Sri.
Digitally signed by :-
NITIKA SRIVASTAVA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…