Allahabad High Court
PRABHA SHANKER SELOTversusBANK OF BARODA CORPORATE OFFICE AND OTHERS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
Petitioner Prabha Shanker Selot filed a writ petition against Bank of Baroda and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner and the petitioner showed no interest in pursuing the case. The respondents had filed a counter‑affidavit but the petitioner did not file a rejoinder. The court observed that the petition was not being prosecuted and therefore dismissed it. The interim order, if any, was vacated.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for want of prosecution
Subjects
- writ petition
- procedural dismissal
- want of prosecution
- interim order vacated
Judgment
Court No. - 38
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 14818 of 2011
Petitioner :- Prabha Shanker Selot
Respondent :- Bank Of Baroda, Corporate Office And Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- G.K. Gupta,J.Nagar
Counsel for Respondent :- Anadi Krishna Narayana,Ashok Trivedi,R.B.
Sahai,S.C.
Hon'ble Abhinava Upadhya,J.
Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta,J.
The case is of the year 2011.
Case has been called out in the revised list. None
appears on behalf of the petitioner to press this
petition. However, Sri Ashok Trivedi, learned
counsel and the learned Standing Counsel
appearing for the respondents are present.
A counter affidavit has already been filed but no
rejoinder affidavit has been filed so far.
It appears that the petitioner is no longer
interested to pursue the matter.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed for
want of prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands
vacated.
Order Date :- 16.4.2018
SKM
(Rajiv Gupta,J.) (Abhinava Upadhya,J.)
Checking your session…