ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

                   HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                            WRIT - A No. - 15037 of 2026

Anil Kumar Srivastava
                                                                     .....Petitioner(s)
                                        Versus

State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                   .....Respondent(s)

Counsel for Petitioner(s)             : Sameer Srivastava, Shivanshu Mehta
Counsel for Respondent(s)             : C.S.C., Kushmondeya Shahi

Court No. - 52
                     HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. K. Shahi, learned counsel
for respondent-BSA as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State-
respondent.

2. The instant writ petition has been filed with the following prayers:

"I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the
respondents to grant and pay all annual increments legally admissible to the petitioner
with consequential arrears, in accordance with the applicable service rules and the
recommendations of the Sixth Pay Commission, taking into consideration his initial
appointment dated 28.12.2005;

II. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the
respondents to re-fix the petitioner's pay and release all consequential monetary
benefits arising from the grant of the aforesaid increments, in accordance with law;

III. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the
respondent authorities, particularly the competent authority, to consider and decide the
representation submitted by the petitioner, by passing a reasoned and speaking order,
within a time-bound period as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court;

..............."

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was
appointed as Assistant Teacher on 28.12.2005 and was allotted Prathmik
Vidyalaya, Gaunjara, Development Block, Koraon. He also contends that
when the petitioner went to join on 09.01.2006 at the said school, he came
                                                                                           WRIA No. 15037 of 2026
                                                                   2


                                    to know that no such institution is in existence, therefore, he moved an
                                    application before the competent authority to allot him some other school.
                                    He further submits that by order dated 31.01.2006, he was allotted
                                    Prathmik Vidyalaya, Chandravat, Development Block Bahariya, where he
                                    joined on 01.02.2006 but the increment of the petitioner is not being given
                                    accordingly, therefore, a direction may be issued to respondent no.3-Basic
                                    Shiksha Adhikari, Prayagraj to look into the grievance of the petitioner
                                    and do the needful.

                                    4. Mr. K. Shahi, learned counsel for respondent-BSA submits that in case
                                    the petitioner moves a fresh representation before the competent
                                    authority, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with
                                    law, keeping in mind the relevant government order.

                                    5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case but without
                                    expressing any opinion on the merits of the case set up on behalf of the
                                    petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of by providing that the
                                    petitioner may make a fresh representation, ventilating all his grievances,
                                    supported by such documents, as may be advised, before the respondent
                                    no.3-Basic Shiksha Adhikari, Prayagraj, within three weeks from today
                                    along with a certified copy of this order. On such representation being
                                    made, respondent no.3 shall make all endeavours to consider and decide
                                    the same, keeping in mind the relevant Government Order, strictly in
                                    accordance with law, by means of a reasoned and speaking order, after
                                    giving proper opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, as
                                    expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six weeks from
                                    the date of production of certified copy of this order, if there is no legal
                                    impediment.



                                                                               (Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.)
                                    September 18, 2026
                                    K.N.




Digitally signed by :-
KALP NATH SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad