Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

VIMAL KUMAR DWIVEDI AND 6 ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN.SECY.DEPTT.OF SPORTS LKO. and ORS.

Decided
Disposal
Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

The petitioners filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No petitioner appeared to pursue the petition, although counsel for the State was present. The Court dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution. Consequently, any interim order that had been granted was vacated. The matter was consigned to the records.

Issues considered

  • Were the petitioners required to appear and prosecute the writ petition, and should the petition be dismissed for want of prosecution?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • dismissal
  • want of prosecution
  • interim order vacated

Judgment

                                              HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                             LUCKNOW
                                                               WRIT - A No. - 15484 of 2017

                                     Vimal Kumar Dwivedi And 6 Ors.
                                                                                                     .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                          Versus

                                     State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Deptt.Of Sports Lko.
                                     And Ors.                                                      .....Respondent(s)

                                     Counsel for Petitioner(s)        : Amitabh Kumar Rai
                                     Counsel for Respondent(s)        : C.S.C., Ashutosh Shahi, Desh Ratna
                                                                        Sinha

                                    Court No. - 18
                                                     HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.

                                    1. Case called out.

                                    2. None is present for the petitioners to press this writ petition.

                                    3. Learned counsel for the State is present.

                                    4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

                                    5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

                                    6. Consigned to records.



                                                                                          (Shree Prakash Singh,J.)
                                    November 26, 2025
                                    AKS




Digitally signed by :-
ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad,
Lucknow Bench


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.