Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

UDHAM SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is disposed of, and the respondent is directed to decide the pending representation within twelve weeks.

Summary

Udham Singh, a Gram Vikas Adhikari, filed a writ petition seeking protection and fixation of his pay. He had already submitted a representation to the second respondent on 11 September 2026 regarding the same matter. The standing counsel argued that the petition was redundant since the representation was pending. The Court agreed that maintaining the writ would serve no useful purpose. Consequently, the petition was disposed of, with an order directing the second respondent to consider and decide the representation within twelve weeks, after serving notice and providing a hearing, unless any other legal impediment exists.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition seeking pay fixation is maintainable when the petitioner has already filed a representation on the same issue before the concerned authority.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • pay fixation
  • Gram Vikas Adhikari
  • administrative representation
  • expeditious disposal

Judgment

                                                  HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                                                WRIT - A No. - 15525 of 2026

                                    Udham Singh
                                                                                                       .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                          Versus
                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                                     .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)             :   Amrendra Nath Rai, Anuj Kumar Singh
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)             :   C.S.C.

                                    Court No. - 33
                                                        HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.

                                    1. By means of present writ petition, petitioner is claiming benefit of
                                    protection/fixation of pay in respect of his post of Gram Vikas Adhikari. In this
                                    regard, petitioner has already moved a representation before respondent no.2
                                    on 11.9.2026.

                                    2. Learned Standing Counsel has submitted that since the petitioner has
                                    already approached respondent no.2, no useful purpose would be served in
                                    keeping this writ petition pending.

                                    3. In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to
                                    respondent no.2 to consider and decide the above-mentioned representation
                                    filed by the petitioner, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within
                                    twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order,
                                    after ensuring service of notice upon all the respondents and providing
                                    opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties provided there is no other
                                    legal impediment.

                                    September 24, 2026
                                    Rishabh
                                                                                           (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
RISHABH KUMAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.