Allahabad High Court
RAGHUNATH PRASAD PALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS
- Decided
- Bench
- VIKRAM D CHAUHAN
Holding
The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
A writ petition (Writ‑A No. 15902 of 2010) was filed by Raghunath Prasad Pal against the State of U.P. and others. The petitioner's counsel, Chandra Dutt and Pradeep Verma, did not appear before the court. Respondent No. 5 was represented by counsel Saumya Mandhyan. The court noted the absence of any petitioner representation to press the petition and consequently dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution.
Subjects
- writ petition
- dismissal
- want of prosecution
- procedural default
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - A No. - 15902 of 2010
Raghunath Prasad Pal
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of U.P. and Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Chandra Dutt, Pradeep Verma
Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Chandra Dutt, M.P.S. Niranjan,
Satish Mandhyan, Saumya Mandhyan
Court No. - 34
HON'BLE VIKRAM D. CHAUHAN, J.
List has been revised. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner to press
this petition.
Ms. Saumya Mandhyan, learned counsel for respondent no.5 is present.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Vikram D. Chauhan,J.)
March 18, 2026
Bhaskar
Digitally signed by :-
BHASKAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…