Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

RAMESH CHANDRA SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court but failed to appear or present any counsel when the case was listed, even after a revised call. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and vacated any interim order that had been previously granted. No substantive merits of the petition were considered. The dismissal was pronounced peremptorily by Justice Anish Kumar Gupta. The order was dated March 18, 2026.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • dismissal
  • want of prosecution

Judgment

                                                 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                            WRIT - A No. - 17074 of 2012

                                    Ramesh Chandra Sharma
                                                                                                .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                       Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And Others
                                                                                             .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)       : Amit Malik, Bramhapal Malick,
                                                                      Hritudhwaj Pratap Sahi, Sankalp
                                                                      Narain, Siddharth Khare, Sri Ashok
                                                                      Khare, Vivek Mishra
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)       : , Ashish Mishra, C.S.C., Rajeev Gupta,
                                                                      Samir.Sharma

                                    Court No. - 39


                                    Sl. No. 62

                                                     HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J.

                                    1. List revised. None appears on behalf of the petitioner to press this
                                    petition even in the revised call. Today the case is listed as peremptorily.

                                    2. Accordingly the instant petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

                                    3. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.


                                                                                      (Anish Kumar Gupta,J.)
                                    March 18, 2026
                                    o.k.




Digitally signed by :-
OM KRISHNA CHOUDHARY
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.