Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SMT. ASHA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P.THRU.ADDL.CHIEF SECY BASIC EDUCATION and ORS.

Decided
Disposal
Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

Holding

The writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner, Smt. Asha Devi, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No petitioner appeared to prosecute the petition, although counsel for the State was present. The Court noted the absence of the petitioner and dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution. Consequently, any interim order that had been granted was vacated. The matter was consigned to the records.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate course of action when a petitioner fails to appear to prosecute a writ petition?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • dismissal
  • want of prosecution
  • interim order vacated
  • High Court

Judgment

                                              HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                             LUCKNOW
                                                               WRIT - A No. - 17585 of 2020

                                     Smt. Asha Devi
                                                                                                     .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                          Versus

                                     State Of U.P.Thru.Addl.Chief Secy Basic
                                     Education And Ors.                                            .....Respondent(s)

                                     Counsel for Petitioner(s)                     :   Rajeiu Kumar Tripathi
                                     Counsel for Respondent(s)                     :   C.S.C., Ghaus Beg

                                    Court No. - 18
                                                     HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.

                                    1. Case called out.

                                    2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.

                                    3. Learned counsel for the State is present.

                                    4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

                                    5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

                                    6. Consigned to records.



                                                                                          (Shree Prakash Singh,J.)
                                    January 5, 2026
                                    AKS




Digitally signed by :-
ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad,
Lucknow Bench


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.