Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

DEEPAK KUMAR and ANR.versusSTATE OF U.P.THRU. PRIN. SECY. BASIC EDUCATION DEPTT. and ORS.

Decided
Disposal
Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

Holding

The writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

The petitioners, Deepak Kumar and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No petitioner appeared to pursue the petition, while counsel for the State was present. The court noted the absence of the petitioners and dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution. Consequently, any interim order that had been granted was vacated. The matter was consigned to the records.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition can proceed in the absence of the petitioner and without prosecution

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • want of prosecution
  • dismissal
  • interim order vacated
  • high court

Judgment

                                              HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                             LUCKNOW
                                                               WRIT - A No. - 17621 of 2020

                                     Deepak Kumar And Anr.
                                                                                                     .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                          Versus

                                     State Of U.P.Thru. Prin. Secy. Basic Education
                                     Deptt. And Ors.                                               .....Respondent(s)

                                     Counsel for Petitioner(s)                  :   Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
                                     Counsel for Respondent(s)                  :   C.S.C., Shivam Sharma

                                    Court No. - 18
                                                     HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.

                                    1. Case called out.

                                    2. None is present for the petitioners to press this writ petition.

                                    3. Learned counsel for the State is present.

                                    4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

                                    5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

                                    6. Consigned to records.



                                                                                          (Shree Prakash Singh,J.)
                                    January 5, 2026
                                    AKS




Digitally signed by :-
ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad,
Lucknow Bench


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.