Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

LOKESH KUMARversusVINOD KUMAR AND OTHERS

Decided
Disposal
Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

Holding

The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

Lokesh Kumar filed a writ petition in 2010 before the Allahabad High Court. The matter was only taken up in 2025, and no party appeared to pursue the petition. The court observed that the petition, being one of the oldest in its jurisdiction and lacking any party to press it, was either rendered infructuous or abandoned. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. Any interim orders, if any, were discharged.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate disposition of a writ petition filed many years ago when no party is present to prosecute it?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • want of prosecution
  • delay
  • dismissal

Judgment

                                                              Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:32452

                                        Court No. - 4

                                        Case :- WRIT - A No. - 18006 of 2010

                                        Petitioner :- Lokesh Kumar
                                        Respondent :- Vinod Kumar And Others
                                        Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Vikram
                                        Singh,L.P.Singh,Sanjai Srivastava
                                        Counsel for Respondent :- Dhirendra Pratap Singh,Manish
                                        Kumar Nigam

                                        Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.

                                        1. This petition was filed in the year 2010. However, when it
                                        is taken up today none is present to press this petition.

                                        2. As the present petition is of the year 2010 and falls in the
                                        category of oldest cases of this jurisdiction and none is
                                        present to press this petition, it appears that either the
                                        petition has rendered infructuous or the revision-petitioner is
                                        not interested in pursuing the matter.

                                        3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for want of
                                        prosecution.

                                        4. Interim order, if any, stands discharged.

                                        Order Date :- 6.3.2025
                                        Deepika




Digitally signed by :-
DEEPIKA SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.