Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SHIV MANGAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. THRU SECY.SUGARCANE LUCKNOW AND ORS.

Decided
Disposal
Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

Holding

The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

Shiv Mangal Singh filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 18034 of 2018) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. No petitioner appeared before the Court to pursue the petition, although counsel for the State was present. The Court noted the absence of the petitioner and the lack of any steps taken to advance the petition. Consequently, the Court dismissed the writ petition on the ground of want of prosecution. The interim order that had been granted earlier was vacated. The matter was consigned to the records.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition may be dismissed for want of prosecution when the petitioner fails to appear before the Court?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • want of prosecution
  • interim order vacated
  • procedural dismissal
  • high court

Judgment

                                              HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                             LUCKNOW
                                                               WRIT - A No. - 18034 of 2018

                                     Shiv Mangal Singh
                                                                                                     .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                          Versus

                                     State Of U.P. Thru Secy.Sugarcane Lucknow And
                                     Ors.                                                          .....Respondent(s)

                                     Counsel for Petitioner(s)        : Bare Lal Bhartiya, Ram Narain Singh
                                     Counsel for Respondent(s)        : C.S.C., Akash Sinha, P.K. Sinha,
                                                                        Prakash Kumar Sinha

                                    Court No. - 18
                                                     HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.

                                    1. Case called out.

                                    2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.

                                    3. Learned counsel for the State is present.

                                    4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

                                    5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

                                    6. Consigned to records.



                                                                                          (Shree Prakash Singh,J.)
                                    January 5, 2026
                                    AKS




Digitally signed by :-
ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad,
Lucknow Bench


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.