Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

INDRA KUMAR TIWARIversusSTATE OF U.P.THRU SECY.COOPERATIVE CIVIL SECTT.LKO. and ORS.

Decided
Disposal
Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

Holding

The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief, but failed to appear before the court. No representative appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition. Counsel for the State of Uttar Pradesh was present and made submissions. The court held that the petition could not proceed in the absence of the petitioner and dismissed it for want of prosecution. Consequently, any interim order previously granted was vacated and the matter was consigned to the records.

Issues considered

  • The writ petition should be dismissed for want of prosecution when the petitioner fails to appear before the court.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • want of prosecution
  • dismissal
  • interim order vacated
  • high court

Judgment

                                              HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                             LUCKNOW
                                                               WRIT - A No. - 18219 of 2018

                                     Indra Kumar Tiwari
                                                                                                     .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                          Versus

                                     State Of U.P.Thru Secy.Cooperative Civil
                                     Sectt.Lko. And Ors.                                           .....Respondent(s)

                                     Counsel for Petitioner(s)                  :   Rajesh Kumar Awasthi
                                     Counsel for Respondent(s)                  :   C.S.C., Jitendra Kushwah

                                    Court No. - 18
                                                     HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.

                                    1. Case called out.

                                    2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.

                                    3. Learned counsel for the State is present.

                                    4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

                                    5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

                                    6. Consigned to records.



                                                                                          (Shree Prakash Singh,J.)
                                    January 5, 2026
                                    AKS




Digitally signed by :-
ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad,
Lucknow Bench


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.