Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

ASHUTOSH KUMAR CHATURVEDI and ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. BASIC EDU. and ORS.

Decided
Disposal
Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

Petitioners Ashutosh Kumar Chaturvedi and others filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No petitioner appeared to pursue the petition, while counsel for the State was present. The Court noted the absence of the petitioners and dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution. Consequently, any interim order that may have been in force was vacated. The matter was consigned to the records.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate course of action when a writ petition is not prosecuted by the petitioners?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • dismissal
  • want of prosecution
  • interim order vacated
  • civil procedure

Judgment

                                              HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                             LUCKNOW
                                                               WRIT - A No. - 18274 of 2018

                                     Ashutosh Kumar Chaturvedi And Ors.
                                                                                                     .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                          Versus

                                     State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Basic Edu. And
                                     Ors.                                                          .....Respondent(s)

                                     Counsel for Petitioner(s)        : Himanshu        Raghave,     Durga     Prasad
                                                                        Shukla
                                     Counsel for Respondent(s)        : C.S.C.

                                    Court No. - 18
                                                     HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.

                                    1. Case called out.

                                    2. None is present for the petitioners to press this writ petition.

                                    3. Learned counsel for the State is present.

                                    4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

                                    5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

                                    6. Consigned to records.



                                                                                          (Shree Prakash Singh,J.)
                                    January 5, 2026
                                    AKS




Digitally signed by :-
ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad,
Lucknow Bench


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.