Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SHRI KRISHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Summary

A writ petition (Writ‑A No. 18683 of 2019) was filed by Shri Krishan against the State of U.P. and others. The petition remained pending since 2019 and the petitioner’s counsel, Ravindra Kumar, did not appear for the hearing. The case was listed under "writs likely to have become infructuous" and a notice required parties to indicate if the cause of action still survived, which was not done. The court observed that the petitioner appeared to have lost interest or that the petition had become infructuous. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the petition as infructuous.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • infructuous
  • non‑appearance
  • procedural dismissal

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                          WRIT - A No. - 18683 of 2019

                                    Shri Krishan
                                                                                            .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                     Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 4 Others
                                                                                          .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)        :   Ravindra Kumar
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)        :   Bhupendra Kumar Yadav, C.S.C.

                                    Court No. - 52
                                                 HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J.

                                    Case is called out. None appears for the petitioner(s) to press this
                                    petition.

                                    It is listed in the category of "writs likely to have become infructuous
                                    (Efflux of Time)".
                                    A notice is also placed in the cause list mentioning that "old cases up
                                    to the year 2022 shall be taken up in the first round itself. In case of
                                    non-appearance, matter shall be dismissed as infructuous or
                                    otherwise, and in the cases, where the cause of action still survives,
                                    the concerned advocates are expected to mark them accordingly in
                                    the cause list. Failure to do so, may result in its dismissal as
                                    infructuous" but, neither the counsel for the petitioner(s) has
                                    appeared nor has the case been marked to indicate that the cause of
                                    action still survives.
                                    The matter is pending since the year 2019. It appears that either the
                                    petitioner(s) has/have lost interest in pursuing the matter or it has
                                    become infructuous.
                                    Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.


                                                                              (Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.)
                                    September 11, 2026
                                    Rahul.




Digitally signed by :-
RAHUL GOSWAMI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.