Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

CHAMAN KUMAR SINGH AND ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. TRANSPORT DEPTT. AND ORS.

Decided
Disposal
Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

Petitioners Chaman Kumar Singh and others filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No petitioner appeared to pursue the petition, while counsel for the State of Uttar Pradesh was present. The Court noted the absence of the petitioners and the lack of any steps taken to advance the petition. Consequently, the Court dismissed the writ petition on the ground of want of prosecution. The interim order, if any, was vacated and the matter was consigned to the records.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate course of action when a petitioner fails to appear and does not prosecute a writ petition?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • want of prosecution
  • dismissal
  • civil procedure
  • high court

Judgment

                                              HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                             LUCKNOW
                                                               WRIT - A No. - 18975 of 2018

                                     Chaman Kumar Singh And Ors.
                                                                                                     .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                          Versus

                                     State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Transport Deptt.
                                     And Ors.                                                      .....Respondent(s)

                                     Counsel for Petitioner(s)              :      Mohd. Ahsanussamad Faridi
                                     Counsel for Respondent(s)              :      C.S.C., Anuj Kudesia

                                    Court No. - 18
                                                     HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.

                                    1. Case called out.

                                    2. None is present for the petitioners to press this writ petition.

                                    3. Learned counsel for the State is present.

                                    4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

                                    5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

                                    6. Consigned to records.



                                                                                          (Shree Prakash Singh,J.)
                                    January 5, 2026
                                    AKS




Digitally signed by :-
ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad,
Lucknow Bench


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.