Allahabad High Court
ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVversusSTATE OF U.P.THR PRIN.SECY.DEPTT.OF BASIC EDU.GOVT.OF UPandORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
- Bench
- PANKAJ BHATIA
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
Anil Kumar Srivastav filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 19304 of 2016) before the Allahabad High Court challenging orders of the State of Uttar Pradesh and its departments. No petitioner appeared before the court to pursue the petition. The counsel for the State and other respondents were present. The Court dismissed the petition on the ground of want of prosecution. Consequently, any interim order that had been granted was vacated. The matter was consigned to the records.
Subjects
- writ petition
- dismissal for want of prosecution
- interim order vacated
- High Court
- procedural default
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 19304 of 2016
Anil Kumar Srivastav
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P.Thr Prin.Secy.Deptt.Of Basic
Edu.Govt.Of Upandors .....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vikas Pandey, Dinesh Kumar Mishra
Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Vindhyawashini Kumar
Court No. - 18
HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State, Dr. Uday Veer Singh, counsel for
respondent no. 3 and Mr. Ran Vijay Singh, counsel for respondent no. 2 are
present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records.
(Shree Prakash Singh,J.)
December 8, 2025
Mayank
Digitally signed by :-
MAYANK PRATAP SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad,
Lucknow Bench
Checking your session…