Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

VIJAY KUMAR YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN.SECY.PANCHAYATI RAJ LUCKNOW and ORS.

Decided
Disposal
Dismissed on merits/Rejected

Holding

The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner, Vijay Kumar Yadav, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No representative appeared on behalf of the petitioner, while counsel for the State was present. The Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and vacated any interim order that may have been in force. The matter was consigned to the records. The judgment was delivered on 10 December 2025.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • dismissal
  • want of prosecution
  • interim order vacated

Judgment

                                              HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                             LUCKNOW
                                                               WRIT - A No. - 22472 of 2016

                                     Vijay Kumar Yadav
                                                                                                     .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                          Versus

                                     State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Panchayati Raj
                                     Lucknow And Ors.                                              .....Respondent(s)

                                     Counsel for Petitioner(s)        : Alok Kumar Pandey, Niteesh Kumar,
                                                                        Vineet Kumar Verma
                                     Counsel for Respondent(s)        : C.S.C., Rajeev Narayan Pandey

                                    Court No. - 18
                                                     HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.

                                    1. Case called out.

                                    2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.

                                    3. Learned counsel for the State is present.

                                    4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

                                    5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

                                    6. Consigned to records.



                                                                                          (Shree Prakash Singh,J.)
                                    December 10, 2025
                                    AKS




Digitally signed by :-
ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad,
Lucknow Bench


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.