Allahabad High Court
PUSHPA GAURversusSTATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN.SECY.BASIC EDU. UP GOVT. and ANOTHER
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dismissed on merits/Rejected
- Bench
- PANKAJ BHATIA
Holding
The petition was dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
The petitioner, Pushpa Gaur, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court but failed to appear for prosecution. The State counsel was present, while no representative appeared for the petitioner. The Court noted the absence of the petitioner and dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. Consequently, any interim order that had been granted was vacated. The matter was then consigned to the records.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition can proceed in the absence of the petitioner for prosecution
Subjects
- writ petition
- procedural default
- vacated interim order
- absence of petitioner
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 22719 of 2016
Pushpa Gaur
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Basic Edu. Up Govt.
And Another .....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sapana Verma, Mohammad Shahan,
Rajeev Kumar Srivastava, Vikram Jeet
Singh Rathore
Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Rajiv Singh Chauhan
Court No. - 18
HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records.
(Shree Prakash Singh,J.)
December 11, 2025
Mayank
Digitally signed by :-
MAYANK PRATAP SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad,
Lucknow Bench
Checking your session…