Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

MANJU DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed as infructuous because the retirement dues have been fully paid.

Summary

Manju Devi filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking payment of her retirement dues from the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents. No counsel appeared on her behalf at the hearing. Respondent No.4, represented by Advocate Shobhit Pratap Singh, informed the court that the entire retirement dues had already been paid to the petitioner. Based on this statement, the court held that the petition had become infructuous. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition seeking payment of retirement dues should be entertained when the dues have already been paid.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • retirement dues
  • infructuous
  • dismissal
  • high court

Judgment

                                                HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                            WRIT - A No. - 2409 of 2026

                                    Manju Devi
                                                                                                .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                       Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                              .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)             :     Avanish Tripathi
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)             :     C.S.C., Mohammad Khalid

                                    Court No. - 34
                                                     HON'BLE VIKRAM D. CHAUHAN, J.

                                    1. List has been revised. No one has appeared on behalf of petitioner.

                                    2. Sri Shobhit Pratap Singh, Advocate holding brief of Sri Mohammad
                                    Khalid, learned counsel for respondent no.4 has stated that entire retiral
                                    dues of the petitioner has been paid.

                                    3. In view of statement of learned counsel for respondent no.4, the writ
                                    petition has rendered infructuous.

                                    4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.



                                                                                      (Vikram D. Chauhan,J.)
                                    March 19, 2026
                                    D. Tamang




Digitally signed by :-
DHIRENDRA TAMANG
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.