Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

PARAMDISH PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. MADHYAMIC SHIKSHA LKO and ORS

Decided
Disposal
Dismissed on merits/Rejected

Holding

The petition was dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

A writ petition (Writ-A No. 24974 of 2021) was filed by Paramdish Pandey against the State of Uttar Pradesh. No petitioner appeared before the court to pursue the petition, while counsel for the State was present. The court dismissed the petition on the ground of want of prosecution. Consequently, any interim order that had been granted was vacated. The matter was consigned to the records.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate course of action when a petitioner fails to appear and prosecute a writ petition?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • want of prosecution
  • interim order vacated
  • High Court of Allahabad
  • petition dismissed

Judgment

                                              HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                             LUCKNOW
                                                               WRIT - A No. - 24974 of 2021

                                     Paramdish Pandey
                                                                                                     .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                          Versus

                                     State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Madhyamic
                                     Shiksha Lko And Ors                                           .....Respondent(s)

                                     Counsel for Petitioner(s)           : Sudhakar Mishra, Ram Bali Tiwari
                                     Counsel for Respondent(s)           : C.S.C.

                                    Court No. - 18
                                                     HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.

                                    1. Case called out.

                                    2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.

                                    3. Learned counsel for the State is present.

                                    4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

                                    5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

                                    6. Consigned to records.



                                                                                          (Shree Prakash Singh,J.)
                                    December 4, 2025
                                    Mayank




Digitally signed by :-
MAYANK PRATAP SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad,
Lucknow Bench


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.