Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

YOGESH SHUKLAversusSTATE OF U.P. THRU SECY. NAGAR VIKAS and ORS.

Decided
Disposal
Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

Holding

The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

Petitioner Yogesh Shukla filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court, but failed to appear for prosecution. The State counsel was present, while no representative for the petitioner attended. The Court noted the absence of the petitioner and dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. Consequently, any interim relief previously granted was vacated. The matter was consigned to the records.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for want of prosecution due to the petitioner's non‑appearance

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • want of prosecution
  • interim order vacated
  • procedural law
  • high court

Judgment

                                              HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                             LUCKNOW
                                                               WRIT - A No. - 254 of 2019

                                     Yogesh Shukla
                                                                                                     .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                          Versus

                                     State Of U.P. Thru Secy. Nagar Vikas And Ors.
                                                                                                   .....Respondent(s)

                                     Counsel for Petitioner(s)        : Akmal Saeed, Gyanendra                Vikram
                                                                        Singh
                                     Counsel for Respondent(s)        : C.S.C., Riyaz Ahmad

                                    Court No. - 18
                                                     HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.

                                    1. Case called out.

                                    2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.

                                    3. Learned counsel for the State is present.

                                    4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

                                    5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

                                    6. Consigned to records.



                                                                                          (Shree Prakash Singh,J.)
                                    January 5, 2026
                                    AKS




Digitally signed by :-
ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad,
Lucknow Bench


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.