Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

JAYJEET MAURYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 ORS.

Decided

Holding

The petition was dismissed because the NCTE notification mandates TET as the qualifying requirement, rendering the BTC certificate insufficient.

Summary

Jayjeet Maurya filed a writ petition seeking to quash the orders of the District Basic Education Officer, Shahjahanpur, which denied his appointment as an Assistant Teacher on the ground that his BTC training certificate was not a valid qualification. He requested that the respondents consider him for appointment, treating the BTC certificate as sufficient. The State of U.P. and other respondents contended that, following the notification dated 23‑08‑2010, the National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE) had made the Teacher Eligibility Test (TET) a mandatory qualification for such appointments. The court examined the effect of the notification and held that the statutory requirement of a TET qualification superseded the petitioner’s BTC certificate. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ petition, refusing to grant the relief sought.

Issues considered

  • Whether the BTC training certificate satisfies the qualification requirement for appointment as Assistant Teacher after the NCTE notification making TET mandatory.

Subjects

  • Assistant Teacher
  • Basic Education
  • Teacher Eligibility Test
  • NCTE notification
  • Qualification requirement
  • Writ petition
  • Quash order

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                           WRIT - A No. - 33721 of 2016

                                    Jayjeet Maurya
                                                                                                .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                     Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 4 Ors.
                                                                                           .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)     : Ashok Khare, Sanjeev Kumar Khare,
                                                                    Sr. Advocate
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)     : Girijesh Kumar Tripathi, Vaibhava
                                                                    Tripathi, Bharat Pratap Singh, C.S.C.,
                                                                    Santosh Kumar, Vaibhav Tripathi

                                    Court No. - 52
                                                 HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J.

                                    Heard Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Khare, learned counsel for the petitioner,
                                    and Ms. Anuradha Sundaram, learned Additional Chief Standing
                                    Counsel, and learned counsel for the respondent-BSA.

                                    The writ petition has been filed with a prayer to quash the orders
                                    dated 27.02.2016/01.03.2016 passed by the District Basic Education
                                    Officer, Shahjahanpur, and with a further prayer to direct the
                                    respondents to forthwith accord consideration to the petitioner for
                                    appointment as an Assistant Teacher in a Junior Basic School of
                                    District Shahjahanpur, treating the BTC training certificate possessed
                                    by the petitioner to be a valid qualification.

                                    Learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel submits that, after the
                                    coming into force of the notification dated 23.08.2010, the NCTE
                                    has made TET to be mandatory qualification for appointment to the
                                    post of Assistant Teacher. Accordingly, the relief as prayed for
                                    cannot be granted.

                                    In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition is dismissed.


                                                                              (Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.)
                                    September 29, 2026
                                    Rahul.




Digitally signed by :-
RAHUL GOSWAMI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.