Allahabad High Court
RAM MURATIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS
- Decided
- Bench
- ANISH KUMAR GUPTA
Holding
The petition is dismissed as infructuous because the GPF amount has already been paid.
Summary
The petitioner, Ram Murati, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. and other respondents to pay his General Provident Fund (GPF) amount (IRRTU 47095) and to decide a representation dated 14 June 2012. The respondent counsel informed the court that the GPF amount had already been paid to the petitioner. On this basis, the court found that there was no longer any relief to be granted. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as infructuous and any interim orders were vacated.
Issues considered
- Whether the respondents are liable to pay the petitioner's GPF amount.
- Whether the petitioner's representation dated 14 June 2012 should be decided by the respondents.
Subjects
- writ petition
- mandamus
- General Provident Fund
- infructuous
- High Court
- payment of dues
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - A No. - 35604 of 2012
Ram Murati
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of U.P. and Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Hemendra Kumar, R.P. Yadav
Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Satish Chaturvedi
Court No. - 34
Sl. No. 49
HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J.
1. List revised. None appears on behalf of the petitioner to press the
instant petition. However, Shri Pankaj Srivastava, learned counsel for the
respondent no. 2 and Shri Manish Kumar, learned standing counsel for
the State respondents are present.
2.The instant petition has been filed seeking the following prayer:
"a. issue a writ, order direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the
respondents to make payment of G.P.F. of the petitioner being its no.
IRRTU 47095;
b. issue a writ, order, direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the
respondents to decide the representation dated 14.6.2012."
3. Shri Pankaj Srivastava, learned counsel for the respondents no. 2
submits that the GPF amount has already been paid to the petitioner.
4. In such view of the matter, nothing survives in the matter. Accordingly
the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Interim
order, if any, stands vacated.
(Anish Kumar Gupta,J.)
May 7, 2026
o.k.
Digitally signed by :-
OM KRISHNA CHOUDHARY
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…