Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

VIRENDRA SINGH FORCE NO 933200693 EX-CONSTABLEversusDIRECTOR GENERAL C.R.P.F. AND OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

Virendra Singh, an ex‑Constable, filed writ petition No. 38895 of 2002 in the Allahabad High Court against the Director General of C.R.P.F. and others. The petition was listed but no further steps were taken to prosecute it. The court noted that no party appeared to press the writ petition and that the State’s standing counsel was present. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and vacated any interim order that might have been in force. The dismissal reflects the procedural requirement that a writ petition must be actively pursued to be entertained.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for want of prosecution

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • dismissal for want of prosecution
  • procedural law
  • civil procedure

Judgment

                                                               Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:225571

                                        Court No. - 10

                                        Case :- WRIT - A No. - 38895 of 2002

                                        Petitioner :- Virendra Singh Force No 933200693 Ex-
                                        Constable
                                        Respondent :- Director General C.R.P.F. And Others
                                        Counsel for Petitioner :- I.P. Yadav,Dhirendra
                                        Kumar,K.C.Tripathi,Rammurat Singh,Ulajhan Singh Bind
                                        Counsel for Respondent :- S.S.C.,B.K.S. Raghuvanshi,Raj
                                        Kumari Devi,S.K. Srivastava

                                        Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra,J.

                                        1. List revised.

                                        2. None appears to press the writ petition.

                                        3. Learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent is
                                        present.

                                        4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

                                        5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

                                        Order Date :- 29.11.2023
                                        CS/-




Digitally signed by :-
CHANDAN SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.