Allahabad High Court
PREM SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
- Decided
- Bench
- MANJU RANI CHAUHAN
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
The petitioner, Prem Singh, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, and only counsel for one of the respondents was present. The Court observed that the petition was not prosecuted. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution and any interim order was vacated.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for want of prosecution
Subjects
- writ petition
- dismissal
- prosecution
- interim order vacated
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - A No. - 40339 of 2015
Prem Singh
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Girja Shanker Mishra, Pratiksha Rai,
Ravindra Mishra
Counsel for Respondent(s) : Kushmondeya Shahi, C.S.C., Siddharth
Khare
Court No. - 52
HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J.
1. List has been revised.
2. None appeared on behalf of the applicant, however, Sri Umang
Srivastava, Advocate holding brief of Sri Siddharth Khare, learned
counsel for the respondent no.4, is present.
3. Accordingly, present writ petition stands dismissed for want of
prosecution.
4. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.)
September 15, 2026
S.A.
Digitally signed by :-
SALMAN AHMAD
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…