Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SMT. INDRA DEVIversusUNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

Smt. Indra Devi filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 42560 of 2014) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the Union of India and three others. The petitioner's counsel, Rajendra Prasad Tiwari and Vinay Kumar Tiwari, were listed but did not appear before the court. The respondents were represented by A.S.G.I., Manish Goyal, Mohan Srivastava and R.R. Shukla. The court noted the absence of the petitioner’s representation and, finding no prosecution of the petition, dismissed it. The dismissal was entered on 19 March 2026 by Justice Vikram D. Chauhan.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for want of prosecution

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • dismissal
  • want of prosecution
  • civil procedure

Judgment

                                              HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                           WRIT - A No. - 42560 of 2014

                                    Smt. Indra Devi
                                                                                                .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                      Versus

                                    Union Of India And 3 Others
                                                                                              .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)      : Rajendra Prasad Tiwari, Vinay Kumar
                                                                     Tiwari
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)      : A.S.G.I., Manish Goyal, Mohan
                                                                     Srivastava, R.R.Shukla

                                    Court No. - 34
                                                      HON'BLE VIKRAM D. CHAUHAN, J.

                                    List has been revised. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner.

                                    Sri Mohan Srivastava, learned counsel for LIC is present.

                                    The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.



                                                                                     (Vikram D. Chauhan,J.)
                                    March 19, 2026
                                    Bhaskar




Digitally signed by :-
BHASKAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.