Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

ANNPOORANA RAI AND 3 ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 ORS.

Decided

Holding

The NCTE notification rendering TET a mandatory qualification precludes the BTC training certificate from being a valid qualification for Assistant Teacher appointments.

Summary

The petitioners, including Annpoorana Rai, sought to have a District Basic Education Officer's order quashed and to be considered for appointment as Assistant Teachers in a Junior Basic School, relying on their BTC training certificate as a valid qualification. The respondents, the State of Uttar Pradesh and others, opposed the petition, citing a 2010 notification by the National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE) that made the Teacher Eligibility Test (TET) a mandatory qualification for such appointments. The court examined whether the BTC certificate could satisfy the statutory requirement post‑notification. It held that the NCTE notification superseded the BTC qualification, making TET the only acceptable credential. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed.

Issues considered

  • Whether a BTC training certificate qualifies for appointment as Assistant Teacher after the NCTE notification making TET mandatory
  • Whether the order dated 30.06.2016 of the District Basic Education Officer can be quashed

Subjects

  • Assistant Teacher
  • Junior Basic School
  • BTC training certificate
  • Teacher Eligibility Test
  • NCTE
  • qualification requirement
  • writ petition
  • education law

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                          WRIT - A No. - 43701 of 2016

                                    Annpoorana Rai And 3 Ors.
                                                                                                .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                     Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 5 Ors.
                                                                                           .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)     : Sanjeev Kumar Khare
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)     : Bhanu Pratap Singh, C.S.C., Rijwan Ali
                                                                    Akhtar

                                    Court No. - 52
                                                 HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J.

                                    Heard Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Khare, learned counsel for the petitioner,
                                    and Ms. Anuradha Sundaram, learned Additional Chief Standing
                                    Counsel, and learned counsel for the respondent-BSA.

                                    The writ petition has been filed with the prayer to quash the order
                                    dated 30.06.2016 passed by the District Basic Education Officer,
                                    Azamgarh, and with a further prayer to direct the respondents to
                                    forthwith accord consideration to the petitioner for appointment as
                                    an Assistant Teacher in a Junior Basic School of District
                                    Shahjahanpur, treating the BTC training certificate possessed by the
                                    petitioner as a valid qualification.

                                    Learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel submits that, after the
                                    coming into force of the notification dated 23.08.2010, the NCTE
                                    has made TET a mandatory qualification for appointment to the post
                                    of Assistant Teacher. Accordingly, the relief as prayed for cannot be
                                    granted.

                                    In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition is dismissed.


                                                                              (Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.)
                                    September 29, 2026
                                    Rahul.




Digitally signed by :-
RAHUL GOSWAMI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.