Allahabad High Court
ARUN KUMAR MANAGER UIN 5232 NABARD U.P.R.O. LUCKNOWversusNABARD MUMBAI THRU CHAIRMAN and ORS.
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)
- Bench
- SHREE PRAKASH SINGH
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
The petitioner, Arun Kumar, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the respondent, NABARD Mumbai. No representative of the petitioner appeared before the court to pursue the petition. The State counsel was present, but the petition lacked prosecution. The court dismissed the writ petition on the ground of want of prosecution and vacated any interim order that may have been in effect. The matter was consigned to the records.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate course of action when a petitioner fails to appear and prosecute a writ petition?
Subjects
- writ petition
- procedural default
- vacated interim order
- petition dismissed
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 47 of 2019
Arun Kumar Manager Uin 5232 Nabard U.P.R.O.
Lucknow .....Petitioner(s)
Versus
Nabard Mumbai Thru Chairman And Ors.
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Digvijay Nath Dubey, Ankur Chauhan,
Nishant Shekhar Mishra, Ranjeet
Kumar Pal, Shruti Sahu
Counsel for Respondent(s) : Neerav Chitravanshi
Court No. - 18
HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records.
(Shree Prakash Singh,J.)
January 5, 2026
AKS
Digitally signed by :-
ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad,
Lucknow Bench
Checking your session…