Allahabad High Court
DAYARAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The petition was disposed of as there was no dispute remaining after the respondent’s acknowledgment of the appointment.
Summary
The petitioner, Dayaram, filed a writ petition seeking enforcement of an order dated 23 April 2026 that permitted him to join as a Class IV outsourcing employee. The respondent college acknowledged the order and the petitioner’s appointment. The court found that there was no substantive dispute remaining for adjudication. Consequently, the court held that the petition required no further hearing. The writ petition was therefore disposed of.
Issues considered
- What relief, if any, should be granted to the petitioner regarding his appointment as a Class IV outsourcing employee?
Subjects
- writ petition
- employment
- outsourcing
- class IV
- disposal
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - A No. - 4754 of 2026
Dayaram
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 4 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Santosh Kumar Yadav
Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ankit Prajapati, C.S.C., Subhash
Chandra Mishra, Yatindra
Court No. - 32
HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.
1.Heard Sri Santosh Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri
A.K.Mishra, learned Standing Counsel and Sri Yatindra on behalf of
respondent College.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in pursuance of an order
dated 23.4.2026, petitioner has been allowed to join on the post of Class
IV as a Outsourcing Employee.
3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent College has
acknowledged the above submission, therefore, nothing is left to decide
this writ petition.
4. This writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
(Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.)
May 18, 2026
SB
Digitally signed by :-
SANDEEP BHATTACHARYA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…