Allahabad High Court
AMITA YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF BASIC EDUCATION LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN
- Bench
- RAJEEV SINGH
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
Amita Yadav filed a writ petition (WRIT-A No. 5051 of 2024) before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. The petition was to be heard on 7 November 2024. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner and no request for adjournment was made. The learned Standing Counsel for the respondents were present. The Court dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution and vacated any interim order that may have been in force.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate consequence when a petitioner fails to appear or prosecute a writ petition before the High Court?
Subjects
- writ petition
- want of prosecution
- procedural default
- interim order vacated
- High Court
Judgment
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:73475
Court No. - 5
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5051 of 2024
Petitioner :- Amita Yadav
Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Basic Education
Lko. And 2 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashutosh
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pradeep Tiwari,Ran Vijay Singh
Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.
List of fresh cases has been revised.
None appears on behalf of the petitioner to press the writ
petition nor there is any request for adjournment.
Learned Standing Counsel, Shri Pradeep Tiwari, Shri Ran Vijay
Singh, learned counsels are present on behalf of respondents.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of
prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 7.11.2024
J. K. Dinkar
Digitally signed by :-
JESHU KUMAR DINKAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad,
Lucknow Bench
Checking your session…