Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

ADITYA PRAKASH DIWAKARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The court held that the petition could be disposed of on the respondents' assurance that the appeal would be decided expeditiously.

Summary

Petitioner Aditya Prakash Diwakar filed a writ petition seeking a direction that his appeal pending before the Chairman of U.P. Power Corporation Ltd be decided within two months. The petitioner argued that the delay was prejudicial, while the respondents, the State of U.P. and two others, assured that the appeal would be decided expeditiously in accordance with law. The court considered the assurance given by the respondents as sufficient to address the petitioner's grievance. No specific statutory provisions or precedents were cited. Consequently, the court disposed of the writ petition, effectively dismissing it on the basis of the respondents' commitment to a speedy decision.

Issues considered

  • Whether the court should direct the Chairman of U.P. Power Corporation Ltd to decide the pending appeal within a specified time frame

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • administrative law
  • expeditious decision
  • appeal
  • public utility

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                            WRIT - A No. - 5550 of 2026

                                    Aditya Prakash Diwakar
                                                                                                 .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                       Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 2 Others
                                                                                               .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)            :      Rakesh Kumar Mishra
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)            :      Abhishek Srivastava, C.S.C.

                                    Court No. - 32
                                               HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

                                    2.Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner’s appeal dated
                                    17.2.2025 which is pending before Chairman U.P. Power Corporation
                                    Ltd. (respondent no.3) be decided within a period of 2 months.

                                    3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that petitioner’s appeal
                                    will be decided expeditiously in accordance with law.
                                    4. On basis of aforesaid assurance given by learned counsel for the
                                    respondents, this writ petition is disposed of.


                                                                                 (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.)
                                    April 20, 2026
                                    SB




Digitally signed by :-
SANDEEP BHATTACHARYA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.